Del Mar  :    :  Racing Community

Del Mar Online Racing Community


Sutherland suspended for failing Woodbine alcohol test

Chat about horses, racing, and the industry.

Re: Sutherland suspended for failing Woodbine alcohol test

Postby Moegray » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:18 pm

no they don't, Canadians put them on backwards - has to do with the barometric pressure up there...

Igeteven wrote: ... they put their paints on the same way we do
User avatar
Moegray
 
Posts: 667
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:20 pm

Re: Sutherland suspended for failing Woodbine alcohol test

Postby Pathagan » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:37 pm

Tvghrtvfan wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IY9-YLErogU


Ernesto - Do you automatically come to a definitive conclusion every time someone runs afoul of set guidelines? Does having 2 glasses of wine make someone a destitute alcoholic and endanger their livelihood (all of a sudden)?
User avatar
Pathagan
 
Posts: 1316
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:48 pm

Re: Sutherland suspended for failing Woodbine alcohol test

Postby Crazykid » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:03 pm

its just more fun to have a few drinks before you ride a horse. good thing they didnt take those tests back in the day. william shoemaker would have won about 8 thousand less races
User avatar
Crazykid
 
Posts: 4712
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:53 am

Re: Sutherland suspended for failing Woodbine alcohol test

Postby Trackmomma » Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:33 pm

I was just accused of disappearing so I guess I better say something here.

To CK,
Amen!!

To Igeteven,
Meeting someone a half dozen times does not mean you know them. Especially on the track. I have worked with her. She can be very nice. She can also be a spoiled little Diva who thinks the rules apply to everyone but her and she should get concessions because she is pretty.
All I can say is, welcome to real life, sweetie.

Comment on the subject in general:
The levels they are talking about don't even result in impairment in most people.They have those levels set to show they have zero tolerance for drinking and riding. Good for them! BUT... the level they are talking about for the first offense that resulted in the suspension Chantal got is less than 2 beers. I have n a .02 from a breath freshener and a .04 from a glass of wine. It doesn't mean she was drunk.
I would be willing to bet this was her first offense. She probably had a couple drinks with lunch before the races and got popped. Dumb, yes, but this is not a sign that she's an alcoholic. It just means she had a drink when she shouldn't have. She has probably done it a hundred times and never been caught. Bet she won't ever do it again.
User avatar
Trackmomma
 
Posts: 260
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:51 pm

Re: Sutherland suspended for failing Woodbine alcohol test

Postby Kermit » Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:29 pm

Trackmomma wrote:I was just accused of disappearing so I guess I better say something here.

To CK,
Amen!!

To Igeteven,
Meeting someone a half dozen times does not mean you know them. Especially on the track. I have worked with her. She can be very nice. She can also be a spoiled little Diva who thinks the rules apply to everyone but her and she should get concessions because she is pretty.
All I can say is, welcome to real life, sweetie.

Comment on the subject in general:
The levels they are talking about don't even result in impairment in most people.They have those levels set to show they have zero tolerance for drinking and riding. Good for them! BUT... the level they are talking about for the first offense that resulted in the suspension Chantal got is less than 2 beers. I have <img src="/images/chat/whale.gif">n a .02 from a breath freshener and a .04 from a glass of wine. It doesn't mean she was drunk.
I would be willing to bet this was her first offense. She probably had a couple drinks with lunch before the races and got popped. Dumb, yes, but this is not a sign that she's an alcoholic. It just means she had a drink when she shouldn't have. She has probably done it a hundred times and never been caught. Bet she won't ever do it again.


That's why we missed you! :D
Thank God for the Federal Reserve. You can't have big government or big wars without them.
User avatar
Kermit
 
Posts: 5147
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:49 pm
Location: Cricket Flat, Nevada

Re: Sutherland suspended for failing Woodbine alcohol test

Postby Trackmomma » Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:33 pm

Thanks, Kermit!
User avatar
Trackmomma
 
Posts: 260
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:51 pm

Re: Sutherland suspended for failing Woodbine alcohol test

Postby Vince P » Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:36 am

I think one of the issues here is her weight.

Correct me if I'm wrong but if you weigh only like 117 pounds like Chantal or me, then one little tiny sip of whiskey or a single line of Coke will make you ineligible to ride according to Woodbine rules.

However, if you're pleasantly plump, like say, Sluggo or Joel, then it takes a lot more to get stoned and banned for a week.

Does that make sense?

Vince P
Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea.
Avatar: My cuzin Isaac Murphy - a jock I'm tying to emulate in character and winning percentage - almost 47% lifetime.
User avatar
Vince P
 
Posts: 4625
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 5:26 am
Location: Brooklyn, USA

Re: Sutherland suspended for failing Woodbine alcohol test

Postby PrivateSmiles » Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:44 am

Kermit wrote:
Trackmomma wrote:I was just accused of disappearing so I guess I better say something here.

To CK,
Amen!!

To Igeteven,
Meeting someone a half dozen times does not mean you know them. Especially on the track. I have worked with her. She can be very nice. She can also be a spoiled little Diva who thinks the rules apply to everyone but her and she should get concessions because she is pretty.
All I can say is, welcome to real life, sweetie.

Comment on the subject in general:
The levels they are talking about don't even result in impairment in most people.They have those levels set to show they have zero tolerance for drinking and riding. Good for them! BUT... the level they are talking about for the first offense that resulted in the suspension Chantal got is less than 2 beers. I have <i_g s="/images/chat/whale.gif">n a .02 from a breath freshener and a .04 from a glass of wine. It doesn't mean she was drunk.
I would be willing to bet this was her first offense. She probably had a couple drinks with lunch before the races and got popped. Dumb, yes, but this is not a sign that she's an alcoholic. It just means she had a drink when she shouldn't have. She has probably done it a hundred times and never been caught. Bet she won't ever do it again.


That's why we missed you! :D



Thank you for the reality check. We don't get enough of those here.
"And Afleet Alex just ran right by Giacomo like he was standing still!"

Tom Durkin, 2005 Belmont Stakes
User avatar
PrivateSmiles
 
Posts: 3620
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:36 am

Re: Sutherland suspended for failing Woodbine alcohol test

Postby Igeteven » Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:51 am

TM

She is young, pretty, nice person, etc,

She has to make her money now, a few years down the road and it's all over for her.

She will get married and start a family.
User avatar
Igeteven
 
Posts: 8262
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:17 pm

Re: Sutherland suspended for failing Woodbine alcohol test

Postby MaryS » Tue Oct 09, 2012 9:59 am

Igeteven wrote:...She will get married and start a family.


She IS married.

So women can't get married and keep working? Just like women don't own hand tools?
I hate it when I don't forward chain letter and I die the next day!
User avatar
MaryS
 
Posts: 4270
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:12 am
Location: Del Mar and Poway CA

PreviousNext

Return to General Racing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests