by Vince P » Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:07 am
Haven't read his manifesto yet, but here's the problem I have with Chris:
Although it's contrary to my religious beliefs, for the most part, I don't have a problem with people who seek revenge when they have been severely wronged; be it a priest who molested you or a family member, a thief who stole your credit identity or even a crooked steward, lol.
But, they must seek revenge AGAINST THE PERSON who WRONGED YOU, NOT society in general or someone that had nothing to do with your situation.
And this is where Chris went wrong.
Yes, killing the daughter of a police captain who wronged you hurts a million times more than killing the captain himself, but that makes no sense to me. What did she or her fiancée do to you? What did that cop you killed do to you?
Why kill an innocent person that had nothing to do with your so called injustice?
Makes no sense to me.
Had Chris beaten the PEOPLE WHO WRONGED HIM to a pulp and then fled, I’d probably say they got what they deserved and I hope he’s never caught.
But once Chris hurt and killed innocent people, he becomes trash in my book.
Do I make any sense?
Vince P
Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea.
Avatar: My cuzin Isaac Murphy - a jock I'm tying to emulate in character and winning percentage - almost 47% lifetime.