Vince P wrote:Now I'm really dazed and confused. I've figuratively googled over 17,000 web sites and exactly 8,500 of them say a colt is under 4 and 8,500 of them say a colt is 4 and under.
The question of the day is: (I'm sure we all agree on the filly/mare definition)
Is a full 4 year old male horse a "colt" or a "horse?"
I vote horse - I'm sticking to my intuition and will say a colt is UNDER 4 years old.
If I'm wrong I'll buy everyone in here an In 'N Out dinner at Santa Anita in early November.
Vince P
Vince,
I just sent a rather lengthy explanation, however, because of the time it took to write it, apparently the site rejected it.
Let me just say that it doesn't make sense to me that a filly would become a mare at age five, but a colt would already be a horse at age four. Both male and female are reclassified so to speak according to their age at five, becoming a horse and mare respectively. A gelding, at the age which he became so, is referred as a "gelding" no matter what his age at the time.
I've often heard even experts refer to an older female (five or up) as a filly, but this is probably more an oversight because of the frequent use of the word "filly" than from ignorance. I've probably also heard the same in reference to the male, referring to them as colts when in fact they're five-years-old or older and should be referred to as horses. Historically, if one is discussing a horse under the age of five, you would call him a colt, even if he raced later as a horse and retired, and is now or had become a horse. After age four, he is always a horse. The same is true for the female. You oftentimes hear older female runners referred to as racemares, but under five, they are fillies.
For referring to the animal as a species, consisting of many breeds, they are all horses; however, for our purposes we have these differences and classifications.