Del Mar  :    :  Racing Community

Del Mar Online Racing Community


Rachel

Chat about horses, racing, and the industry.

Rachel

Postby Srotagtbs » Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:58 pm

So the Travers would have been the tougher test eh?
Last edited by Srotagtbs on Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Srotagtbs
 
Posts: 574
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:19 am

Re: Rachel

Postby Risen Star » Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:03 pm

I had a lot of mixed feelings about Rachel running against older males. I was torn watching that race.

IMO, Rachel is an all-time great, and she's earned that distinction. However, my hat also goes off to these older males who gave her a real run for her money. To ask a three-year-old to run against older, accomplished males, is always a tall order, especially a filly.

I hope everybody is, and stays, in good order.
Risen Star
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:50 pm

Re: Rachel

Postby PeteMo » Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:06 pm

Gutsy win, congrats to her, its been an amazing run. That being said if they are not going to the BC its time to put her away for awhile. This was her toughest test, she was game..but she got weight and was all out. Beat older, but anyone can see this group of handicap horses is nothing special, just feel she has done enough for now, its been a grinding campaign.
PeteMo
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Rachel

Postby PrivateSmiles » Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:08 pm

There really isn't any reason to run her again this year, is there? Not even to face Zenyatta. She's already proven she's better than Zenyatta.
"And Afleet Alex just ran right by Giacomo like he was standing still!"

Tom Durkin, 2005 Belmont Stakes
User avatar
PrivateSmiles
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:36 am

Re: Rachel

Postby PeteMo » Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:11 pm

PrivateSmiles wrote:There really isn't any reason to run her again this year, is there? Not even to face Zenyatta. She's already proven she's better than Zenyatta.



How has she proven she is better than Zanyatta? I did not see where they ran against each other? Mine that bird without trouble beats her in the Preakness, if Zenyatta was in the Preakness she would have won by 5 lengths. Very likely Zenyatta would have had a perfect pace set up today to win the Woodward.
PeteMo
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Rachel

Postby Risen Star » Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:12 pm

PeteMo wrote:Gutsy win, congrats to her, its been an amazing run. That being said if they are not going to the BC its time to put her away for awhile. This was her toughest test, she was game..but she got weight and was all out. Beat older, anyone can see this group of handicap horses is nothing special.




I respectfully disagree about these handicap horses not being special. Many of these horses, while not having superstar status like Rachel, have won graded stakes races, and whether the filly is three or four, this is a great filly, who's beaten everybody in sight, and frequently by large margins. But the field she faced today certainly made Rachel know she was in a horse race.
Risen Star
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:50 pm

Re: Rachel

Postby PeteMo » Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:19 pm

On numbers this group of older horses not in the same zip code as Ghostzapper, Saint Liam, Invasor. Not taking anything away from her, but the group she beat, on thorographs is over 10 lengths behind Ghostzapper.
PeteMo
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Rachel

Postby Thinkinproblem » Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:21 pm

A breeders cup win for her would seal her greatness. Until then . . .there will always be that tiny shred of doubt.
"The bill approved in Congress to avert the so-called fiscal cliff would bring the first major tax increase on high earners in 20 years."

Wall Street Journal, Jan 2nd 2013
Thinkinproblem
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:37 am

Re: Rachel

Postby Risen Star » Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:28 pm

Rachel may run as a four-year-old, and if she does, a Breeders' Cup at Churchill Downs will no doubt be on the schedule.

As to her greatness, IMO, she's already there even without a BC.
Risen Star
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:50 pm

Re: Rachel

Postby Masterp » Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:31 pm

How has she proven she is better than Zanyatta? I did not see where they ran against each other? Mine that bird without trouble beats her in the Preakness, if Zenyatta was in the Preakness she would have won by 5 lengths. Very likely Zenyatta would have had a perfect pace set up today to win the Woodward.


Time to give Rachel her due...sounds like you are a big Zenyatta fan (which is alright) but can't admit when another horse has run a much, much, much tougher campaign on several different surfaces against much better competition.

Rachel is HOY...she can now take a well deserved break.
Masterp
 

Next

Return to General Racing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: PeteMo and 5 guests